Thursday, March 6, 2014

Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead

Misc. Information
Author: Tom Stoppard
Setting: a little bit of everywhere, the setting isn’t very detailed and leaves the reader a little bit confused.
Characters
Rosencrantz: Like a child in many ways. He tends to stumble upon riches (in the beginning when they are flipping coins) and in the movie, he stumbles upon many different concepts from physics. He is seen as less intelligent than Guildenstern. He is confused for Guildenstern in the play, to the point where it is seen as a motif of the play.
Guildenstern: More of an adult figure. He looks out for Rosencrantz. As a more intelligent character, he tries to use logic to understand his situation, but whenever he gets close to understanding the situation, he forgets.
Player: He seems to be more in control of the play than R and G (I’ve decided that typing Rosencrantz and Guildenstern is really repetitive and takes a lot of time, so I’m just going to call them R and G) are, and seems to understand that the play is a loop. He is seen as a more powerful character, and he understands the dynamic of the play better.
Claudius, Gertrude, Hamlet, and Ophelia: Not very major characters, but because they were big in Hamlet, I thought it would be rude not to include them.
Tragedians: The “actors” in the play that Hamlet hires, they are like the player’s posse. This includes Alfred, who, out of all the tragedians, is the only one who has a real name.
Summary
The play opens on R and G flipping coins. A strange phenomenon has occurred, where the coin is only coming up heads. R has been calling heads the whole time, so his bag of money is fuller than G’s. G tries to explain this by using many “laws” that are incorrect.
They stop flipping coins and think about how they got to the point that they’re at. They remember that a messenger called for them. Other than that, the readers learn that R and G forget things almost as soon as they happen.
After this deep heart to heart, they stumble across the player and the tragedians. It soon becomes vary apparent that the player is trying to sell R and G sex, however R and G are oblivious, so the player tries to drop more obvious hints, it becomes nearly painful for the reader.
After this silly encounter, R and G suddenly appear in Elsinore! (what!?!) they are told that Hamlet has gone crazy, and that (being his two best friends) they should find out what is troubling him, and try to help fix it. This proves to be quite the issue later on when they cannot find him.
Before Hamlet goes off on his crazy killing spree (just kidding, he only kills Polonius), R and G run into the Player and his tragedians, who are angered by the fact that R and G just left them in the woods. He soon gets over it, and R and G explain their situation with Hamlet. He tries to lend some helpful advice.
The player leaves and we learn that Polonius has been killed. It is R and G’s job to find Hamlet and Polonius’ body. Gertrude and Claudius decide that it’s a good idea to send Hamlet to England, and so R and G go with him. However, instead of actually getting on a boat, they magically appear on it in a dark room.
On the boat they talk about many different things, but one reoccurring conversation was the one about G liking boats, and how he would totally live on one if given the chance (however, we know this will never happen.) It’s reflected back in the end with the quote “our first mistake was getting on a boat.” But we’ll get to that later. First lets talk about the other stuff that happens.
R and G practice what they’ll say to the king of England, and accidentally open up the letter tat was given to them by the king. They learn that Hamlet is to be put to death. However, Hamlet was also listening to them practice, and realizes that he is going to his death. He plans against this and writes a different letter, about R and G’s death, and closes it with his royal seal.
R and G come across the player and the tragedians, but before they can fully greet each other, the boat is attacked by pirates!! Hamlet hops a ride with the pirates, and R and G are flustered! What are they to do? They practice their revised lines now, and accidentally open the letter again! This time, instead of mentioning Hamlets death, they read about their own impending doom. The player tries to console R and G, but as the play comes to a close, G starts to understand that the play is just a loop, and they will just be reborn the next time someone opens Hamlet (the book)
Stuff that happens that isn’t necessarily important about the summary, but still means stuff to the book.
·         The repetition of conversations is a common motif in the play, but the information that is repeated isn’t necessary.
·         The ‘Question and Answer’ game
·         R and G practicing their lines when they aren’t in the play of Hamlet
·         Repetition of them forgetting.
Thesis
T-Stopz’ Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead contrasts the confusion and language of the stage with the audience, commenting that because life is not a work of art we are not limited by the same laws of fate that characters are and therefore may exercise free will.
Quotes and why they’re important
·         “It is written” although this isn’t a long quote, this is a major moment of epiphany for readers. The idea that R and G were in a play before was obvious, but now we start to realize that everything that they do is written, and they can’t stray from the text. This line was a big help in writing the thesis statement.
·         “well, we’ll know better next time.” This is the last thing that G says before disappearing in the end of the play. Before this point, we as readers understand the loop that R and G are stuck on, but up until now, we were led to believe that they remained ignorant about it. We see here that G understands his fate, this too was a help in writing the thesis.
Major Motifs
o   Confusion
o   Language
o   Chance/ Fate
o   Death

o   Theatre

3 comments:

  1. Rachel,
    I think you may need a bit more about Stoppard; just to understand what he was dealing with which may show insight to this play. You did a great job with your characters thought. All that detail will come in handy when trying to remember this play later. I think you hit all of the important points of the plot but I personally like bullet points to keep everything precise and orderly but if you are a paragraph person go be you. I love your "Stuff that happens that isn’t necessarily important about the summary, but still means stuff to the book." this is a useful area and a great way to remember the minor details in the book that you may have otherwise forgot. Overall you did a great job the only thing I would add is more information on Stoppard's life.
    Sincerely,
    Ana

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rachel, overall good anaylsis and summary of Ros and Guild! I thought it was interesting when reading your characters that you mentioned that Guild is somewhat of an adult figure compared to Ros. I had not thought of them this way before but I could see how you came to this conclusion. I have always thought that they are more of equals and without one, the other would be lost, however you bring a good point and there are many times throughout the play when Ros relies on Guild for direction. Everything else looks good; the only thing I think would strengthen this would be to add some of the points of view, tone, imagery and techniques of the author. Also to may provide more evidence to support your thesis. Besides that, this is a great summary and I enjoy how much character and personality you put into your blog posts! It makes them very enjoyable to read!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Rachel,
    I think is a nice, organized Summary and Analysis post. You hit on some great information that will be helpful for later on. I thought that your best sections were the Characters and Quotes. I liked how thorough you were in these sections, and you really came up with good reasoning and evidence that you might even be able to use in an essay. Honestly, a lot of your random stuff could fit into some important motifs and ideas. For example, the Question and Answer game is a good testament to the Absurdist elements of the work, which are very important. You also might want to be a little more straightforward in your summary. I know this is your study tool, but I don't think it is helpful to add in unnecessary interjections. You also might want to elaborate on your setting. It leaves the reader confused, but it is much, much more significant than that. You also might want to add in the narrative voice section for this post in particular, since Stoppard's voice/ideas are prevalent in the play. On the whole, good job!

    ReplyDelete